Installing Canon MF3240 on Windows 7 64 bit (x64)

You probably inserted the CD that came with this printer and got a dialog box during the driver installation that complained about 64-bit incompatibility. Thanks, Canon, for providing the 64 bit drivers on the CD! (/sarcasm)

Anyway -- here's how you install the scanner and printer drivers for this device on Windows 7 64-bit machines --

1. Detach the printer from the computer.
2. Visit the follow link (http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&tabact=DownloadDetailTabAct&fcategoryid=335&modelid=12943)
3. Find the "Select OS" dropdown and select "Windows 7 (x64)" from the list.
4. Click the red download link (MF3200_MFDrivers_Win_x64_us_EN_7.exe).
5. Scroll to the bottom of the next page and click "I agree -- begin download".
6. Save the executable to an easy to remember location on your computer. Browse to the folder in Explorer and run it. It will extract the drivers to a subdirectory in the same directory as the executable called "MF3200_MFDrivers_Win_x64_us_EN_7". Remember the location of this folder for later.
7. Attach the printer to the computer.
8. Ignore or cancel out of any automatic prompts that Windows tries to open. It will not be able to find the right drivers on Windows Update or elsewhere.
9. Click the Start menu button and search for "Device Manager". Open it.
10. Under both the "Imaging devices" and "Other Devices" tree menu subitems, you will see CanonMF3200 devices (there should be a CanonMF3200 entry in both tree menu subitems). They should have question marks or exclimation marks next to them, meaning they are not functioning or are not installed.
11. Right click on both of these devices and select "Update Driver Software". Click
    Browse my computer from driver software" and browse to the driver folder ( that you extracted to earlier (called "MF3200_MFDrivers_Win_x64_us_EN_7"). Again, you will need to do this two times -- for both devices (scanner / fax and printer).
12. You should be done.

Let me know if you need clarification or this does not work.

7-zip not in context menu 64-bit Windows 7

This is a known problem.

Solution / Workaround: Download 7-zip 32 bit version. This version should put items in the context menu.

MagpieRSS question marks

If you are trying to use MagpieRSS, you might encounter an issue where quotation marks (single and double quotation marks), and other characters, are simply displayed as questions marks (?) in the RSS output.

The issue is an charset issue. 1) You need to tell Magpie to output in utf-8. 2) Additionally, your HTML page needs to be in the same charset.

For 1)

Before any of your MagpieRSS code ... include these PHP statements.

define('MAGPIE_INPUT_ENCODING', 'UTF-8');

define('MAGPIE_OUTPUT_ENCODING', 'UTF-8');


For 2)

Make sure your page has this at the top ... you might need to replace whatever is already defined on the page.

EDIT: Blogger doesn't like META tags ... here is what you need at the top of your page: http://pastebin.ca/1852343


Thanks to http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=309378 for the tips.

Concatenate Date and Time From Two Fields -- MySQL

Example
In this example, I'm checking whether a time slot in a schedule table is in the future.

SELECT * FROM table
WHERE concat(date(appt_date)," ",time(start_time)) > NOW( )
ORDER by appt_date desc, start_time desc, end_time desc

Change essays, application after submission of Common Application (CommonApp)

Copy and paste this is your browser --

https://www.commonapp.org/CommonApp/Default.aspx?allowcopy=true

Then sign in and follow the instructions. You'll want to click the "Replicate" button on this page.

Bottled water - wasteful, expensive, and unsanitary

Bottled water has three general problems -- it's wasteful, expensive, and unsanitary.

Source: http://www.onlineeducation.net/bottled_water/

Wasteful
-----------

a) They are horrible for the environment (17 million barrels of oil are used in the production of water bottles every year).

b) It takes 3 times the amount of water to produce the bottle as it does to fill it.

Expensive
-----------

c) Bottled water is extremely costly relative to tap water (up to 10,000x as expensive) -- .0015 cents / gallon vs $10 / gallon). In some alternate universe, this might actually be worth it if the water was sanitary, but it's not (points d, e, and f).

Unsanitary
-----------

d) 40% of bottled water has been taken from municipal water sources (i.e. 40% of bottled water IS tap water).

e) 22% of bottled water contains chemical contaminants at levels above strict state health limits.

f) Bottled water isn't regulated like tap water is. It doesn't have to be checked for E Coli, it is not subject to quality reports, the companies that produce it are not required to provide the source of the water, and it can still be distributed when tap water standards (which are deplorable and outdated it and of themselves) are not met.

Basically, bottled water is even worse than tap water, on almost every count. Except, I think it tastes better, (but certainly not because it's cleaner)

Liberal Misrepresentation of the Tea Party events (smear tactics) -- what are the Tea Parties really about?

I found this statement in a community college newspaper (Hutchinson Community College in Kansas) the other day --

People aren’t willing to find out facts behind their beliefs, instead blindly accepting whatever they hear or read as fact, or fiction depending on said beliefs.

Take a look at the people that are involved in the Tea Party movement, an organization filled with angry people who believe that their disparaging comments and actions are going to bring about change in America. Simply reading some of their signs shows their lack of reasoning and information. These slogans range from “Abort Obama”, “F@#$ The Poor” and the classy “I’m not your ATM Obama.”

I was a little teed off after reading this because I have personally attended Tea Party events, and I know they are not "full" of fringe, radical right-wing crazies trying to push their ideology of religion, anti-abortionism, etc down people's throats with violence and hateful signs. Yes, there are some isolated instances of this, but that is hardly the entire story, as anyone who rises above the cable chatter knows. I tried to make this clear to the author. Here is my response --

******************************

I find this article highly offensive and ignorant on several levels. However, for how, I just want to focus on the comment ___ made about the Tea Party movement. Let me address several of his ideas about the movement point by point –

I want to discuss a) my personal experience with the tea parties, b) the actual principles of the tea party movement, d) the cause of the limited extremism at the tea parties, and d) the reality of what goes on at the vast majority of the tea parties.

a) My personal experience: I have personally attended a Tea Party event (the 4th of July Dallas Tea Party event, specifically), and I did not find the people to be "angry" in the slightest, or their comments to be negatively "disparaging" in the least (there is a difference between constructive criticism and pure disparagement). The Dallas Tea Party event on the 4th of July of this year was a calm, docile event filled with reasoned (and enthusiastic) participants standing for what they believe. Your disparaging comments about the character and disposition of the people at these events are typical of the blatantly misrepresentative smear tactics that have been used by far-left persons even since the Tea Parties began. You have gone too far when you begin maligning the thousands of responsible, average citizens involved in grass-roots small-government activism with some of the more radical, unrepresentative instances you cited (such as the signs with “Abort Obama”, etc). Your generalization (events being “filled” with radical people) personally offends me as I was a part of one of these events, and I believe myself to be an open-minded and civil person, not a racist, ignorant, and narrow-minded one. Not only does it offend me because it’s not true of me, but it’s not true in general. What you have claimed is blatantly contradicted by what actually happens at these events. I will get back to that after discussing the principles of the tea party.

b) The actual principles of the tea party movement: The Dallas Tea Party and the majority of the other tea Parties (nearly all of them, I dare say) stand for the same basic principles – limited government, fiscal responsibility, personal responsibility, the rule of law, and national sovereignty. For example, the platform for the Dallas Tea Party as of a few months ago (was on their website) were as follows --

1. Limited Government – As our Founding Fathers recognized, restraint of government is necessary to protect the liberties of the people.
2. Fiscal Responsibility – Government at all levels must learn to live within its means. To saddle future generations with the crushing burden of our excess spending is unconscionable.
3. Personal Responsibility – Liberty is unsustainable without responsibility. Each citizen must take responsibility for the consequences of his or her own actions while respecting the rights and dignity of others.
4. The Rule of Law – Consistent, independent and uniform application of the law is critical to a free and prosperous society.
5. National Sovereignty – We must maintain a strong national defense, effective security for our borders, and sole control over our land and our laws.

These principles are what the Tea Party movement is really about. There are radical extremes in every movement, and these surely must be contained – but it is not useful, instructive, or fair to focus on the excessively negative examples and ignore the positive aspects of the movement. Yes, there have been crazy people touting crazy signs at some limited number of Tea Party events, but as a recent opinion article in the Dallas Morning news said, the reality is that that the events are filled with a wide variety of people espousing different points of view, “united in their fear of the future and bedrock belief that Washington is not to be trusted”, not a “rabble-rousing mob of right-wing hotheads and religious nuts”.

The Humble Libertarian website summarizes some reasonable Teabagger principles on their website – which are –

* Voting out each and every single incumbent up for re-election in 2010 who voted for the Stimulus Package and/or the 2008 Wall Street Bailout.
* Electing to office only candidates who promise to support a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution (without any exceptions -e.g. in the case of war, emergency, or a 3/5ths vote in Congress) in an act that also requires spending reductions only (no raising taxes) for the first four years to balance the budget, as well as:
* The transition of Social Security from a mandatory pay-as-you go system to an optional system of private pensions.
* A permanent repeal of the payroll tax.

c) The repugnant signs you mention are the result of a lack of leadership in the Tea Party movement -- as the Dallas Morning news opinion article says, “the tea partiers' main problem is lack of responsible leadership to bring focus, coherence and moderation to their movement.” The policing of the radical fringes of the movement is not something that is really being taken seriously at the moment, and this is why some have gotten a skewed perspective about what we are all about (the media misrepresentation does not help, either). Yes, the Tea Parties have leadership issues that need to be addressed, but this does not imply the issues being discussed at the events are irrelevant or should be completely dismissed. Liberals have every right to recognize and be outraged at the problem with the Tea Parties (fringe protestors touting repugnant signs), but they do not have the right to ignore the actual substantive issues the Tea Party wants addressed.

d) What really happens at the tea parties: I have already given you anecdotal evidence about what goes on at the Tea Parties from my own personal experience. The same experience I mentioned has been repeated at thousands of other events as well. Bryon York describes a Tea Party event in Virginia as follows – “If you listened to the speeches at the Tax Day tea party held in the courthouse square of this northern Virginia town, population 25,733, you might not have caught the name of the man in the White House. Among many denunciations of high taxes and out-of-control government spending, there were just a couple of mentions of Barack Obama -- one when a local activist criticized the administration's cap-and-trade energy plan, and the other when a city businessman said he prays for the president … Here in Winchester, Tax Day was a serious and well-meaning affair. For the people here, there are principles at stake in this fight, and, as much as they can, they intend to stand up for what they believe.” Instances like this reinforce the notion that this movement is not based out of ignorance and racism – but people shocked at the expansion of the role of government in our daily lives (runaway federal spending, etc).

Conclusion: Your view of the Tea Party is misrepresentative of reality. The events have problems with fringe protestors, but this does not mean you can dismiss the thousands of reasoned, principled citizens participating in acceptable ways and trying to change their country for the better.

Sources

http://www.humblelibertarian.com/2009/03/american-tea-party-2009-goals.html
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-march_0917edi.State.Edition1.281f723.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Small-town-rally-shows-true-meaning-of-tea-parties-43078082.html